
A randomized clinical US trial studying the effects of climate impact labeling on fast food reveals that when presented with food marked as having a high impact on the climate, consumers will likely choose a different, more sustainable item.
Within the study of 5,049 US adults, participants were shown a fast food menu and prompted to select one item from randomized menus, each with one of three label conditions: either a QR code label on all items (for the control group), green-colored ‘low climate impact’ labels on chicken, fish or vegetarian items (positive framing) or red-colored ‘high climate impact’ labels on red meat items (negative framing).
Of these participants, almost a quarter (23%) in the high climate impact label condition chose to order a more sustainable item (non-red meat). Similarly, compared to the control group, 10% more participants in the low climate impact label condition ordered a sustainable item.
The authors conclude that climate-impact menu labels may effectively promote sustainable restaurant food choices and that negatively-framed high climate-impact labels appear to be the most effective.
About the Author
EcoVadis is a purpose-driven company dedicated to embedding sustainability intelligence into every business decision worldwide. We offer a full range of solutions including IQ-Plus Risk & Compliance Management, EcoVadis Ratings, and Carbon Action Module for Scope 3 Decarbonization. Key features like 360/Live News Monitoring, Academy E-learning and Corrective action plans help companies comply with ESG regulations, reduce GHG emissions, and improve the sustainability performance of their business and value chain across 250 industries in 185 countries.
Follow on Linkedin
Visit Website
More Content by EcoVadis EN